For developers and product teams

Keep accessibility work moving with your SaaS releases

Use rendered-page evidence to turn an EU customer request into scoped engineering work, then re-scan as the interface changes.

A practical release workflow

Find concrete barriers

Scan one page free or crawl the saved site, then sort findings by severity and affected element.

Give engineering a usable fix

Keep the rule, selector, source snippet, and remediation guidance together instead of passing around a score.

Watch the next release

Schedule scans, compare trends, track resolved issues, and draft a statement from current evidence.

Put accessibility checks into the release loop

Use targeted re-checks, CI, comparable-run diffs, and authenticated journeys to keep concrete evidence near engineering work.

Pull request

Run the shipped GitHub Action or GitLab CLI with an explicit new-finding policy.

Targeted verification

Re-scan the changed route and keep the rule, selector, source snippet, and affected-page evidence together.

Regression diff

Compare completed runs only when the page set and standard are comparable.

Authenticated states

Model repeatable checkpoints for product states that a public crawl cannot reach.

What automation can support

Rendered-rule checks, configured CI policy, reached-page counts, comparable-run changes, and checkpoint findings.

What still needs people

Interaction quality, task completion, assistive-technology behavior, content meaning, and a conformance assessment.

See the evidence before signing up

The sample is a real report view: severity, affected element, rule, and a practical direction for the fix. Automated coverage is clearly separated from manual review.

Preview of a wcagc scan report
Preview of a wcagc scan reportOpen sample report

Common questions

Is this only for accessibility specialists?
No. The workflow is written for developers, product teams, operators, and delivery leads, with the underlying rule and evidence kept visible.
Does a clean scan mean the site conforms?
No. Automated checks cover only part of WCAG. Manual review is still required for a conformance assessment.
What can the team do after a scan?
Save the site, scan more pages, track recurring rules and regressions, follow the manual checklist, and draft an accessibility statement from the evidence.