Test critical paths
Scan admissions applications, course catalogs, and financial-aid forms, then schedule keyboard and assistive-technology review.
For colleges and universities
Keep campus accessibility work visible
Review campus websites and student portals against automated WCAG 2.1 AA checks. Public institutions can plan for applicable ADA Title II dates without treating a scan as proof.
Work through the student journey
Monitor decentralized sites
Track department and faculty sites in one workspace while keeping ownership of each fix visible.
Document current evidence
Build a draft Accessibility Conformance Report from evaluated criteria, with untested criteria and automation limits stated explicitly.
See the evidence before signing up
The sample is a real report view: severity, affected element, rule, and a practical direction for the fix. Automated coverage is clearly separated from manual review.
Common questions
Is this only for accessibility specialists?
No. The workflow is written for developers, product teams, operators, and delivery leads, with the underlying rule and evidence kept visible.
Does a clean scan mean the site conforms?
No. Automated checks cover only part of WCAG. Manual review is still required for a conformance assessment.
What can the team do after a scan?
Save the site, scan more pages, track recurring rules and regressions, follow the manual checklist, and draft an accessibility statement from the evidence.