Comparison
wcagc.com vs UserWay
We fix the underlying source code instead of layering a widget on top. Here's a factual comparison of the two approaches: ours vs. the UserWay widget.
Last verified: June 2026, based on public documentation on <a href="https://userway.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">userway.org</a>.
| Feature | wcagc.com | UserWay |
|---|---|---|
| Core Approach | Automated scanner and manual review checklist for developers to fix their source code. | JavaScript widget overlay added to the website. |
| Pricing Model | Flat monthly/annual rate regardless of page count or traffic. | Scales based on the monthly website traffic (pageviews). |
| Installation | Run via CI/CD pipeline or triggered manually from our dashboard. | Requires adding a JavaScript <script> tag to your website's <head>. |
| Remediation | Permanent fixes applied to your source code by your developers. | Fixes applied dynamically at runtime when the page loads. |
Frequently asked questions
Is wcagc.com a good UserWay alternative?
For teams that want to fix accessibility in the source code instead of layering a widget on top, yes. wcagc.com scans pages against WCAG 2.1 AA and EN 301 549 and helps you document conformance.
How is wcagc.com different from UserWay?
wcagc.com is a testing and documentation tool, not an accessibility overlay or widget. Nothing is injected into your site; you get a prioritized list of issues to fix and an honest view of what automation can and cannot verify.
Can I try wcagc.com for free?
Yes. Scan a page, use the WCAG 2.1 AA checklist, and check color contrast for free, no sign-up required. Full-site scanning and statements are on the paid plans.
Ready to fix your source code?
Run a free scan without installing any scripts.