Comparison
wcagc.com vs accessiBe
We fix the underlying source code instead of layering a widget on top. Here's a factual comparison of the two approaches: ours vs. the accessiBe overlay.
Last verified: June 2026, based on public documentation on <a href="https://accessibe.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">accessibe.com</a>.
| Feature | wcagc.com | accessiBe |
|---|---|---|
| Core Approach | Automated scanner and manual review checklist for developers to fix their source code. | JavaScript snippet overlay added to the website. |
| Pricing Model | Flat monthly/annual rate regardless of page count or traffic. | Scales based on the number of website pages or monthly traffic. |
| Installation | Run via CI/CD pipeline or triggered manually from our dashboard. | Requires adding a JavaScript <script> tag to your website's <head>. |
| Remediation | Permanent fixes applied to your source code by your developers. | Fixes applied dynamically at runtime when the page loads. |
Frequently asked questions
Is wcagc.com a good accessiBe alternative?
If you want to find and fix real accessibility issues in your code rather than install a third-party widget, then yes. wcagc.com is an automated WCAG 2.1 AA and EN 301 549 scanner with a manual-review checklist and accessibility statements.
How is wcagc.com different from accessiBe?
wcagc.com never adds an accessibility overlay or widget to your site. It reports issues so you can fix the underlying HTML, and it is explicit that automated checks cover only part of WCAG; the rest needs manual review.
Can I check my site for free?
Yes. A single-page scan, the WCAG checklist, and the contrast checker are free with no account. Paid plans add full-site scans and accessibility statements.
Ready to fix your source code?
Run a free scan without installing any scripts.